Preparing for Critiques

Evaluation in art school

The artwork is only one part of your evaluation.

What are you evaluated on in art school?

  1. The artwork you make
  2. Your presentation and documentation of it
  3. Your self-awareness as an artist and ability to talk about your ideas with confidence and clarity
  4. Your ability to ask relevant questions and provide constructive and meaningful feedback in critique

Different types of critique

How do you get feedback about your work?

Different types of feedback have varying purposes. Critique is usually formulated to be either developmental or evaluative. Developmental critiques, while still following formal etiquette, are meant for learning how to apply your critical thinking, give feedback, and talk about your work. The emphasis is on practicing these skills as a group, rather than making judgement and formulating individual evaluation by the instructor.

Evaluative critiques are significantly more formal and follow specific predetermined procedures. They are often reserved for end-of-program evaluations, thesis reviews, and graduate school.

Knowing which type of critique you are having gives you insight to the stakes and what aspect of feedback and development is being emphasized.

  1. Traditional group crit - The artist presents the work with little to no explanation at first. Instructor and classmates respond in turn. The artist speaks at the end and answers questions when asked.
  2. Cold / silent read - The artist presents the work without any explanation. The instructor and classmates discuss impressions of the work. The artist does not speak at all.
  3. Artist-first - Opposite of a cold-read. The artist frames their intentions, influences, and questions up front so feedback can address what they are actually trying to do, rather than guessing.
  4. Question-based - The artist leads, asking for specific feedback about aspects of the work
  5. Sticky-note crit - Peers respond in writing, anonymously or signed, giving the artist something to read later.
  6. Studio visits - one-on-one meetings with other artists, teachers, professional artists, critics, and curators. Good for getting outside perspectives and input on in progress work.
  7. Formal review / jury - Typical for end-of-semester/program or thesis works, a panel of faculty and external reviewers evaluates the work.

Layers of Engagement

What factors play a role in how someone engages with your work?[1]

Thinking critically about an artwork

What are the steps to analyzing an artwork, in order to provide critical and effective feedback? [2]

  1. Hear / Look / Sense - Begin by intuitively experiencing and sensing the work without trying to think about what it means, how the components work together, or how they were made. Just experience: sense, hear and look without applying judgement.

    • What stands out?
    • What are you attracted to?
    • How does it make you feel in your body?
    • What emotions or memories do you experience?
  2. Listen / See / Review - Start to think more in detail about what you are seeing/listening to and consider how to apply meaning.

    • In the elements that stand out to you, how does the combination of sound and image construct meaning for you?
    • What colours, shapes, sounds, movements, gestures, motifs, tones, spaces do you notice? Do any of them contribute to the way you experienced the work?
    • Do you notice any specific themes or ideas the work is attempting to address?
    • What do the combination of the elements of audiovisual composition suggest?
  3. Think / Engage - Consider what you know about the work, the artist, the broader contexts, the way in which it might be described.

    • What genre or kind of work is this?
    • What types of existing art does it remind you of? This can be a type of art, a specific artwork, or another artist.
    • How can this or does this contextual awareness shape how your experience the work?
  4. Understand / Reflect - Combine layers of perceptual experience with contextual ones. How does this help to codify your experience of and response to the work?

    • How do perceptual and contextual layers of the work relate to one another? Or how do they shape one another?
    • Do you understand the point of view or what the artist is attempting to express with the work?
    • Was something missing from the work that would have enhanced the idea further?
    • Are there personal or sociopolitical factors that shape how you engage with the work?

Critique etiquette

In this course, we are focused on developing our critique skills together as a class. In that sense, your evaluation is based, not only on the merits of your work, but also on your depth of engagement with the critique process. It is therefore important for you show up and be engaged with your peers and their work.

Critique is a reciprocal process. You can't expect people to give you useful feedback if you aren't willing to engage in good faith in return. Here are are some useful things to keep in mind during the process:

For the artist

For the responders

For everyone


  1. Harris, "Analyzing Audiovisually" in Composing Audiovisually (2025), pp. 112-13. ↩

  2. Modified from Harris, Composing Audiovisually (2025), pp. 114-15. ↩